Alecks' 2010 Sierra

you hit a pothole and will use all of the 3/8 of travel. were not discussing long travel, were talking standard travel to get you through a normal day. You enter a steep driveway and boom you're on the stops.
 
I'm not gonna argue with you any more. All I said was it looks better with some height to the truck, not flat cuz that defeats the purpose of a lift IMO. It's not gonna be the death of the truck. If he doesn't wanna do it, he doesn't have to. I liked the way my trucks rode, sorry your vag is salty.
 
I'm not gonna argue with you any more. All I said was it looks better with some height to the truck, not flat cuz that defeats the purpose of a lift IMO. It's not gonna be the death of the truck. If he doesn't wanna do it, he doesn't have to. I liked the way my trucks rode, sorry your vag is salty.
The real purpose of the lift is tire clearance and height, not ground clearance. :read:

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
is it that difficult to understand that having little to no down travel is how you bend/brake suspension components and get your teeth knocked out when you hit a decent bump?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SamCarroll
Lower it

:hidesbehindsofa:
giphy.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Khaos
sam, im not saying the ride is gonna be great. but in my mind, for what alecks is doing, it isnt going to justify the 3k he will spend.
i dont think he needs to swap crossmembers, but coilover swap and light crank for height but still maintaining angles and good travel numbers, not sitting just above the bumps. Thats a ride nobody likes, even at the mall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeanH1290
i dont think he needs to swap crossmembers, but coilover swap and light crank for height but still maintaining angles and good travel numbers, not sitting just above the bumps. Thats a ride nobody likes, even at the mall.
i agree, i think switching to coil overs and keeping decent stuff is the correct move. i was basically saying i wouldnt waste nearly the money for a complete swap to a FTS is my big thing.